notice update

posted Jun 1, 2017, 7:27 PM by Yonggeun Kim

Due for final submission : 6th June
Exam ; 13th June 2-4pm FCM meeting room A

Thank you

Feedbacks for final presentation

posted May 18, 2017, 12:16 AM by Yonggeun Kim   [ updated May 18, 2017, 12:21 AM ]

Dear all,

I compiled the comments for each of your case studies. Please read one by one carefully though some are not your own. Please review the requirement for your final presentation again. It helps you understand what kind of information & data is necessary to proceed your own final presentation. It is highly recommended to try to read the case study article chosen by Ms. Nazi & Ms. Ismat. You can find these at the end of schedule page

And Mr. Chris, Sorry but the youtube like you gave me doesn't work. Please send me a valid link.

If you have any feedback let’s talk about it next Monday. 

Please don't forget to read the article for Monday too. 

Thank you.

  • Vikky,
    • It is necessary to review your proposals based on the core ideas on HTP. It is about how to improve productivity in organization. To reach this goal you need to have a very detailed data on your case study. The case study on starbucks Malaysia and 3M needs more data in this aspect. The last one on bilingual deaf children has less relevancy on the productivity improvement in organization. 
  • Raymond
    • Since the final case study is about how to improve organization you are required to analyse how your proposed technology can contribute the improvement of productivity in existing organization. Or you can suggest that your technology can replace an existing intervention that has been tried in other project. If the given technology is a qualified solution then it is required to explore in what situation is the best to deploy this solution to improve the real world situation. I believe this is the difference between inventors and businessman in their role. 
  • Ismat
    • The paper you choose has enough data to analyse the intervention made for Nortel. I believe if you are able to proposed an alternative intervention in comparison with the given idea in the name of Virtual Mentor you case study would be successful. 
  • Fritz
    • The problem you stated is not a problem but a situation. The data you mentioned needs its citation source to justify your interventions. This means your cause analysis needs evidence. It will be very nice if you can give us examples. And it is necessary the differentiate intervention and solution. Please read the text book on this matter. 
  • Mindy
    • In my understanding paper you chose proposes the principles to amend the existing safety guideline for maritime industry towards more effective way base on the varied observations and research. Is there any other related paper that deals with a real world application with the proposed principles? Please help me clarify your plan with the chosen papers. 

Teaching Evaluation Exercise in CaMSys for Trimester 3, 2016/2017 (Term ID 1631)

posted May 15, 2017, 7:43 PM by Yonggeun Kim

Please be informed that the Teaching Evaluation Exercise in CamSys for Trimester 3, 2016/2017 (Term ID: 1631) will be open for students starting from 15thMay 2017 until 28th May 2017.

Students may visit the following address to participate in this exercise:

URL for the system: or students may directly go to

(CaMSys username and password are required to proceed to the next step).

Student participation rate is very important to ensure validity of the evaluation. Each subject should achieve a certain participation rate in order to meet the validity guideline set in the Dean's meeting held in July 2003.

The said guideline is as follows:

In the case where the number of registered students in a class is 100 and above, the participation rate must be 30% and above for the evaluation to be valid. However, should the registered number of students in a class is 99 and less, the participation rate must be 50% and above in order for the evaluation to be valid.

The attached files are the User Manual and FAQ on AES for reference.

Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Yonggeun Kim

Classroom, final confirmation

posted Apr 19, 2017, 11:31 PM by Yonggeun Kim

Dear all, 

Apology first for repeating changes.

The venue for regular classes has changed again. 

Human Performance Technology, MONDAY5-8pm, FCM meeting room B

But I can guarantee that the new room is more convenient that previous one. 

So the schedule is as below. 

​week 07 April 24 No class - holiday
               April 28 Replacement@FCM meeting room B
week 08 May   1 No class - holiday
week 19 May   8 Regular class@FCM meting room B
week 10 May 15 Regular class@FCM meting room B
week 11 May 22 Regular class@FCM meting room B
week 12 May 29 Regular class@FCM meting room B

Thanks you.

Yonggeun Kim

Preparation for week 4

posted Apr 6, 2017, 11:20 PM by Yonggeun Kim   [ updated Apr 6, 2017, 11:22 PM ]

Dear all students, 

Please be informed the required preparation for the next week. 

  1. The Classroom has changed.
    1. Old : DR2006
    2. New : PG Lab. (as same as last week)
    3. This change is permanent till the end of this semester. 
  2. Student action
    1. 1st briefing on individual Case Study Analysis
      1. Prepare 1 slide proposal on his/her week12 presentation.
      2. Present and ask feedback about his/her proposal
      3. If necessary you can use audio/video or any interactive resource.
    2. Remark
      1. Don't take this too serious or don't try to find the right answer for this briefing that doesn't exist at all. 
      2. Just try to get the first feedback about what you are thinking now for your final presentation. 
      3. Try to find the case studies in the name of human performance technology. 
        1. e.g.. google human performance technology case study

1-5 of 5